“A Stitch in Time Saves Nine”-Regulating KPME Act, 2007

Image Credits:

The Indian Government has a constitutional obligation to provide health facilities, as settled by law, which makes the integral to the right to life.

Healthcare is a matter of the states. However, there has been a constant corrode in the healthcare systems across the country. This largely arises due to differences in availability, accessibility, insurance coverage, and service delivery models among Private and Public health systems. These inadvertent issues have put the nation into a state of acute medical malfunction!

Karnataka is among a long list of states with and inadequate implementation in terms of laws pertaining to healthcare. The Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act was passed in 2007 “to bring comprehensive legislation in place of the ”. This was an effort to register private healthcare providers and identify genuine medical practitioners and make the legislation more patient-centric. The repeated efforts at proposing key amendments to the KPME Act, 2007, were directed at keeping tabs on the functioning of the private sector healthcare establishments and personnel.

Though it is the patient’s interests that need to be prioritised over those of the medical providers, suggested amendments caused widespread upheaval through the Karnataka medical fraternity. came from the private sector against the amendments because of price capping, imprisonment terms and raised fines, grievance redressal, and other things that were deemed controversial.

A steady waning in the number of people availing healthcare service at government hospitals has given precedence to private players, who in turn derive bigger profits by exploiting the bleeding situation and pushing larger numbers into further poverty. Intended transformations and regulations are thus meant to contain emerging trends and provide better access and quality healthcare for all people, irrespective of economic and social statuses. The state’s vision for its healthcare system must determine what is possible and propose workable solutions to its identified problems.

The sole legislation that Karnataka has in terms of the health sector doesn’t have enough to demand complete accountability. With the exponential growth in the private sector, ranging from multitudes of one-room clinics, dispensaries, and small nursing homes to large corporate hospitals, there lies an innate tendency for these revisions to be biased to this sector. The public sector is still critically underfunded and its facilities are mostly weighed down by long waiting lists, scarce medical supplies, and out-of-date technologies. This makes for an unintended drift towards private providers. With maximising gains here the hollowness of this revision glares through multiple deficiencies.

The recommended a structure that included all streams of healthcare provision, from allopathy to Ayurveda, Yoga, and Homeopathy, in order to simplify the registration process. This meant the adoption of a Patient’s Charter on the lines of the and guidelines while addressing grievance redressal through state and district authorities. This Report, however, came under scrutiny in terms of it leaving out government hospitals and coming across as .

Following the model, implementation of legislation in Karnataka probably requires a committed authority to regulate healthcare provisions. In fact, the amendments can also take a note out of the Government’s move of framing a law to prohibit and make the “cuts and commission” practice by PMEs an offence.

In an attempt to make the legislation more stringent in order to check on bossism by the private providers there are a few things that can be considered straightforward benefits to those who seek medical care. As a saving grace, the Scheme brings relief on disastrous expenses that shove patients and their families towards poverty. It also takes the edge off the terrible risk that is caused due to these expenses.

Even though the private sector has mostly enjoyed the comfort of the legislative cushion here, the public sector is waking up to appropriate upgrades to infrastructure in terms of tertiary care hospitals and medical colleges under (PMSSY).

An overview of Cuba’s system reveals that its healthcare outcomes are those of a developed country, although it has the economy of a developing country. Its current model of was achieved post the revolution and provides an excellent example.

The status of India’s healthcare is a complicated fact to discuss. A healthier nation depends largely on an empowered public health system. Therefore, every state’s legislation needs to equip this sector and give it primary status making the private sector a complementary asset to achieve broader healthcare goals. We need to take a step back and realise that healthcare means the difference between life and death. Whether the system is private based or public based, power needs to be derived from the community in order to ensure that the people have the right care at the right time.





Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

This Island Country Does Not Have Caucasian, Light-Skinned People, So Let’s Ignore What’s Happening…

Newspaper on fire. Credits: Nieman Labs


The Philippines Revisits a Dark History, Cambodia in the Spotlight

The Indian Namaste goes global

The G7 meeting provides an opportunity to further Canada’s commitment to ensuring equitable…

Cutting Foreign Aid Would Save Domestic Lives | Dan Mikhaylov — Orthodox Conservatives

Don’t let the impact of Cash Voucher Plans to go Waste

The Festival of Ideas at St John’s: 7 top events

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
gourab panda

gourab panda


More from Medium

Sofia Roehrig: Writer, Editor, and Leader in High School Filmmaking

Japanese flowers photograph


Social Media Don’ts We Should Care About